How is the personal, political, social, and economic meaning of work and labor conveyed in the context of art production?
Lesson #3: With the globalization of the economy in full swing, the relationship of textile and cloth to labor (and often exploitation) make the issues raised by this lesson of special interest today. Almost every piece of textile we encounter holds the charged history of outsourced garment workers; the different systems of production and consumption in factories and homes; and insinuations about class, gender, and sexuality through clothing. When textile is used in art making, it may comment on the messy politics of its production, its mobility between nations and the power dynamics those exchanges symbolize.
What separates the labor that the underpaid workers in South Asia do to make clothing and how artists use textile to for their art? They are laboring in the same way to create a product. But it is a sense of cultural significance and purpose separates them, a commentary meant to be reflected on in a museum rather than being worn. These works are made to be shown publicly, as opposed to being used in a private and individual way.
In her video work Gioconda (2007) Karina Svirsky uses the so called immigration crisis as an entry point to explore the plight of recent immigrants who work long hours doing menial jobs long after emigration. Blurring the lines between the documentary and the fictional, the video charts Gioconda’s every movement as she ardently cleans a hotel room. The soundtrack mixes cleaning sounds with sampled tracks from Hollywood border films evoking Gioconda’s own crossing from Mexico into the US-a memory that remains part of her sub-conscious even as she successfully emigrates to the United States.
Pilvi Takala, The Trainee, 2008, video and installation
In this video, Takala documents her stint as an office intern where she didn’t do any work.
To realize the project, the artist worked for a month as a trainee "Johanna Takala" in the marketing departement of Deloitte where only few people knew the true nature of the project.
During the month long intervention an initially normal-seeming marketing trainee starts to apply peculiar working methods. Gradually she shifts from the position of someone others believe normal to the object of avoidance and speculation. The videos and slideshow reveal a spectrum of ways other staff members respond to the odd intern in the office. Sincere interest and bewildered amusement is juxtaposed with demands directed at the superior regarding the strangely behaving worker.
One of the videos shows her spending an entire day in an elevator. These acts or rather the absence of visible action slowly make the atmosphere around the trainee unbearable and force the colleagues to search for solutions and come up with explanations for the situation.
Ai Weiwei, Sunflower Seeds, 2010, installation at the Tate Modern Turbine Hall
The work consists of roughly 100 million hand-painted porcelain sunflower seeds covering a vast expanse of floor to the depth of about four inches, and visitors were invited to wade right in. Some 1,600 residents of a village called Jingdezhen, that once provided porcelain to the imperial court, produced them over the course of five years, as documented in a video (above) that accompanies the piece. Ai came into the village when it had fallen on economic hard times and most of the traditional artisan methods used in the town were disappearing. He gave the workers a new form of income with the sunflower seed project, but the project was still criticized for its similarity to procedures in China's other factory towns, where laborers work long hours with little return. The piece has a subtle political commentary apart from its manufacture, since in Ai's country of origin, China, Chairman Mao used to be represented in propaganda posters as the sun, while the Chinese people were shown as sunflowers turning towards him.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete